This is the fifth in a series of six posts inspired by several visits to Hot Springs, Arkansas, once known as The American Spa. I believe that much can be learned from the history and current state of the place for those of us who are interested in spa culture and the future of spa as a contributor to the health and vitality of both people and planet. It has been a meandering journey, appropriate here since the essential subject is water. This post focuses on water.
Who owns water and who oversees its use and purity are becoming increasingly challenging topics the world over. If spa is to include water in its ethos, it must also be concerned about and involved in how the use of water in its services impacts everyone who shares that water. The issues will be different for different geographical areas and communities. Water is valuable and vulnerable to misappropriation and misuse.
For some all this might be an argument for distancing spa from its original connection with water but for me that would be to lose an opportunity to deepen that connection. This brief consideration of the National Park which was established to protect or control the thermal waters (depending on who you talk to), historic Hot Springs and the surrounding area, is presented to illustrate just how complex the issues around water can be.
The rate of flow of the springs in Hot Springs is not affected by fluctuations in the rainfall in the area; the thermal water comes from a deep source. Most of the water is collected in a broad valley underlain by hard fractured rock with cracks and pores through which the water flows. The waters used to discharge higher up the downtown hillside than they do now. Over time, some channels ceased to flow while others revived. Temperatures average 143 F and have declined about 5 F since records have been kept; it is uncertain why.
Some of the changes in water characteristics have been caused by human activity. The valley floor has been filled in to make it flatter and wider. Areas of tufa have been removed or covered. Non-indigenous plant varieties have been introduced. Most of the springs are covered over, and their water runs through underground pipes rather than filtering down the hillside. The upper and lower springs are interconnected and in a delicate natural balance with each other, easily disturbed by human interventions. More on the geology of the area.
[The creek you see in the mid-17th century painting above is now in a tunnel under Central Avenue.]
Fracking and Fluoride
Around the time of my most recent visit, two other water issues came up for the region. Just after I left town on 27 February 2011, a 4.7-magnitude earthquake struck the area. The strongest in 30-40 years, USGS said it appeared to run along a previously unknown fault. Its possible connection (a growing concern) with hydraulic fracturing (fracking) injection wells for oil and gas collection (north east of Hot Springs) was not ruled out.
Fracking pumps water and chemicals into the ground to produce rock fractures. Hydrofracking activity followed by earthquakes is repeated across the US, though the industry and the EPA deny correlation. In 'Fracking the life out of Arkansas and beyond', Rady Ananda writes regards the concerns: 'it's not likely that Arkansas citizens will get much help from the federal government. Nor will they find a friend at the state level. The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality has so far been unwilling or unable to stop UMETCO ... from illegally dumping toxic chemicals into streams.'
Download Hydraulic Fracturing Two articles from JPT(Official Publication of The Society of Petroleum Engineers, Dec. 2010): History of an Enduring Technology; and The Fuss, the Facts, and the Future.
Update: 28 March 2011, Arkansas earthquakes decline after 'fracking' injection well closures.
Risks from fracking aside, natural deep-sourced thermal waters seems to be relatively safe from adulteration. Surface waters on the otherhand, in addition to risk from pollution, can contain natural disease-causing organisms, for example Legionnaires' disease, cryptosporidiosis and giardiasis in the US. Piped city drinking waters are treated to eliminate these. For another more controversial 'health' reason, city water is frequently supplemented with artificial fluoride though some have fought long and hard against this. In Arkansas, that battle has just been lost.
On March 2, 2011, Arkansas state representatives voted in favor of a bill requiring fluoride be added to public drinking water systems serving 5000 or more people. That will include 32 communities, like Hot Springs, that to date have not added fluoride to their drinking water. Opponents have argued that communities should be able to control their water supplies, and others that fluoride is insidiously toxic. It's a subject rife with controversy and adds another important thread that involves water to the health history of our modern world.
Here is an extract from a Wikipedia entry that is slanted toward fluoridation but does present the other side:
Like vaccination and food fortification, fluoridation presents a conflict between benefiting the common good and infringing on individual rights. Fluoridation can be viewed as a violation of ethical or legal rules that prohibit medical treatment without medical supervision or informed consent, and that prohibit administration of unlicensed medical substances. It can also be viewed as a public intervention to replicate the benefits of naturally fluoridated water in order to free people from the misery of toothache and dental work, with greatest benefit to those least able to help themselves, and where it would be unethical to withhold such treatment.... Despite support by public health organizations and authorities, efforts to introduce water fluoridation have met considerable opposition.
Our attitude towards natural mineral water
Returning to the healing qualities of natural mineral waters, it is notable that the National Park Service literature does not emphasize their current value or use in illness. From NPS publication (Fire in Folded Rocks, 1980):
'The National Park Service does not claim the water is curative, but the park does certify that it is safe to drink. The water is colorless, odorless, and tasteless - it lacks much iron and sulphur. The federal government still protects the springs. The park's Water Quality Laboratory and state-certified analysts ensure that the water meets rigorous federal and state drinking water standards. The water is tested regularly at numerous sampling points.' ...
'Individual springs began to gain a reputation for alleviating specific ills.... At one time or another, almost any of the open springs could have gone by the designation, 'Mud'.... Minor differences in the composition of the individual waters do exist but their overall similarity indicates common origin. All of these waters are now mixed together, and a single supply goes to each bathhouse.'
There is also an interesting note of mild caution: 'The level of exposure to radiation (due mainly to dissolved radon gas and secondarily to radium - both considered to have curative properties in the past) that results from bathing appears to be similar to the level that would result from sitting in the sun for the same period. A greater exposure may result from drinking the water, which is still considered well within safe limits. Other natural waters throughout the world have similar levels of activity.'
The National Park Service leaflet 'Drinking the Water' summarizes the mineral contents of the thermal water and the two cool water springs at Happy Hollow and Whittington Spring. There is a useful map of the location of the nine fountains. The park provides spring water free of charge at all its jug fountains. Private individuals are prohibited from selling the park's waters.
For those who advocate for the value of medical hydrotherapy (mainly through naturopathic medicine in the US, in European spa clinics and organizations, and elsewhere in the world), finding and sharing both experiential and scientific evidence for the beneficial effects of natural mineral waters is an important task if the subject is not to remain one of quaint history or quackery. Waters may be both drunk and bathed in and these two uses have different, though related, practical (economic) and therapeutic implications.
This history of using natural waters for specific medical ailments as opposed to relaxation (the modern spa emphasis) represents another important avenue by which we might help preserve and celebrate the value of water through spa endeavors. I suggested at the start of this series on Hot Springs, Arkansas, that in reviewing the ideologies behind spa or spa culture, we have an opportunity to heal or at least recognize some historical ills. I suspect that our attitude toward water holds the key to this healing.
A message about water on Vision Spa Retreat
Posts in this series:
Recent Comments